Sales POC Guide: When to Run One (And When to Skip It)

A sales POC (proof of concept) lets a prospect test your product before committing to purchase. It's how B2B software buyers can build confidence that a solution actually does what it says on the box.

POCs have been a staple of enterprise software sales for decades. For good reason: they build buyer confidence, surface objections early, and give potential customers the proof they need to sign. But they're also expensive. A single sales POC can tie up your sales engineers for weeks, demand significant effort from the prospect, and slow down a deal that might have closed faster with a different approach.

The best sales teams don't default to sales proof of concepts anymore. They treat them as one (of many) options for building trust with a prospect. From interactive demos to a full pilot they match the format to what the deal actually requires. The result: fewer wasted SE hours, shorter sales cycles, and higher close rates on the POCs they do run.

What Is a Sales POC? (And What It's Not)

A sales proof of concept (POC) is a hands-on trial where a potential buyer tests your software solution in a real or simulated environment before committing to a purchasing decision. It's a feasibility check. The buyer is asking "will this actually work for us?" before signing anything. If buying a piece of enterprise software was buying a car, this would be the test drive.

A sales POC typically involves configuring your product for the prospect's use case, giving their team access for a defined period, and measuring whether it meets agreed success criteria. It can be one of the most resource-intensive steps in the B2B sales process, and one of the most misunderstood.

The confusion usually starts with terminology. Sales teams use "demo," "POC," and "POV" loosely, sometimes interchangeably. They're not the same thing.

The simplest way to think about it:

• A demo is "let me show you what this does."
• A POC is "let me prove this works in your world."
• A POV is "let me prove the dollars you'll save."

In practice, plenty of teams use POC and POV interchangeably. That's fine. What matters is that everyone on the deal agrees on what you're actually proving. Are you proving the product functions? Or proving it delivers value? Those require very different levels of investment from both sides.

The line between demos and POCs is also getting blurrier. Interactive demos now give potential buyers hands-on experience without the full setup burden of a traditional sales POC.

Types of POCs (By Resource Investment)

Think of a POC like building an MVP. You're not trying to build the final product. You're trying to prove something with the least amount of resources possible. Will this software solution work for them? Can you give them enough confidence to move forward?

There's no rigid definition of what a proof of concept has to look like. A case study could very well serve as one. If your company is well established and you've got a case study showing you've already solved for exactly the same pain points for a very similar company, that might be enough sales proof to close the deal. You're just trying to give the potential buyer enough confidence to move forward.

That said, when people talk about running a POC, it usually falls into one of three categories. They're organized here by resource investment, from lightest to heaviest.

1. Free trial

If your product's "aha moment" can be reached by a user in minutes, a self-serve free trial can be a great proof of concept. Products like Slack, Notion, and Atlassian rely on this model. Free trials work best when the product's capabilities are immediately apparent and the buyer experience is smooth from sign-up.

But there's a hidden cost. Delivering a good free trial experience requires massive investment in self-serve onboarding flows, in-app guidance, and product design that makes first-time use intuitive. Not every product is built for that, and not every product can be. Free trials also offer no guided path through the product's capabilities, so potential customers may never discover the features that address their specific pain points.

If your software solution requires meaningful setup or configuration before it's useful, a free trial just gives the prospect a blank screen and a bad first impression. Unlike free trials, interactive demos let you control the buyer experience from the start.

2. Interactive demos and sandboxes

This is the middle ground that didn't really exist five years ago. If your product normally requires significant time before it's useful, interactive demos let you skip all of that.

You create a controlled environment the prospect can click through, paired with interactive tours that guide them through key workflows and explain how things work. There's essentially no setup time for the prospect, and you can easily personalize per deal.

Tools like HowdyGo let you build these once and tailor them for each prospective customer, making it a scalable way to deliver POC-like experiences without burning sales engineer cycles on every deal.

When interactive demos are enough on their own

For most deals, the prospect doesn't need to test your product in their actual environment. They need to understand how it works, see how it handles their pain points, and get enough buyer confidence to move forward.

Interactive demos handle this. They look and feel just like the real product. Guided demos coach the prospect through specific workflows step by step. Sandboxes give them a one-to-one clone of the entire product they can freely click around. Either way, the potential buyer gets firsthand experience of the product's ability to solve their use case without anyone provisioning accounts or loading sample data.

As an example you can try out, we've embedded a sandbox environment of Salesforce below, feel free to try it out and click around!

For a demo to do the job of a sales POC, it needs to feel realistic (built from the actual product, not screenshots), allow self-service exploration, be personalised for the prospect's use case, and provide detailed analytics so you know who engaged and where they dropped off.

The hybrid approach

Interactive demos don't necessarily have to replace other types of POCs. They can supplement them:

• Demos as a qualification stage. Use interactive demos as stage one: qualify interest, identify which stakeholders are engaged, and answer "is this worth a full evaluation?" Graduate to a full POC only for deals that pass the demo stage. The result: fewer but higher-quality POCs, and faster sales cycles for everyone else.
• Demos as pilot guides. If you are running a full pilot program, interactive demos can act as coaching tools within it. Instead of relying on kickoff calls and documentation to enable the buyer's team, give them guided walkthroughs that help them get more out of the pilot. This improves the quality of the evaluation process and reduces the support burden on your sales engineers.

Below is an example demo guide to coach prospects through Komo's interface.

3. Full-scale pilot

The heaviest option. You're importing the prospect's real data, configuring for their actual processes, and running with real users in a real world environment. This isn't a pre-implementation. It is an implementation, and it should be priced accordingly.

Many enterprise vendors charge for pilot programs, and it makes sense to: the resource investment is significant on both sides. Products like SAP, ServiceNow, and enterprise security tooling often require this level of evaluation, including data migration and extensive integration with existing systems.

It should be your last resort, not your default.

The best sales teams don't treat POCs as binary. They have a spectrum of sales proof options, from a case study to a guided demo to a full pilot, and they deploy the right one for each deal. The question isn't "should we run a sales POC?" It's "what's the lightest-weight way to give this potential buyer the confidence they need to buy?"

Create your first demo

Start your free trial today, no credit card required. Or book a demo with our team.

Start 14-day trial

Book a demo

When to Run a POC (And When to Skip It)

POCs are expensive. They tie up your sales engineers for weeks and demand real time from the prospect's side too. That makes them worth doing well when they're necessary, and worth skipping when they're not. Every POC you run is a bet on that deal being worth your team's time.

Run a POC If...

Skip the POC If...

The POC Decision Matrix

A simple way to think about which approach fits: map deal size against technical complexity. This helps sales reps and solutions engineers make informed decisions about where to invest their time.

The point isn't that POCs are bad. It's that they're costly, and the best sales teams are deliberate about when they deploy them. "Skip the POC" doesn't mean skip proof. It means choosing a lighter-weight way to prove the solution meets the buyer's needs.

How to Run a Sales POC

This is your sales POC playbook. Whether you're running a lightweight evaluation or a full-scale pilot, the same core steps apply.

1. Define objectives and success criteria

What does the prospect need to validate? What does "pass" look like? This is the most critical step in the POC process.

Get specific. "The team liked it" is not a success criterion. "Pilot users agree that task completion time can be reduced by 30% because the workflow eliminates five manual steps" is. Agree on the prospect's success criteria upfront, in writing, before anyone builds anything. Make sure your sales rep and the buyer's project manager are on the same page about what you're proving.

2. Identify stakeholders

Map out who's involved on both sides. Who's the executive sponsor? Who are the evaluators? Who has veto power? Getting buy in from multiple stakeholders early prevents a successful POC from stalling at the finish line.

Different decision-makers will care about different aspects of the product's capabilities. Your engineering lead wants to see integrations and architecture. Your end users want to see the day-to-day workflows. Your CFO wants to see the business case. Plan your sales POC so each stakeholder sees the flows and features that matter to them.

3. Set scope and timeline

Define what's in and what's out before you start. Scope creep is the single biggest risk in any POC process. If the prospect keeps adding technical requirements mid-evaluation, you'll never reach a decision point.

Set a firm timeline and stick to it. The length should match the complexity of what you're proving, not the prospect's indecision.

4. Configure the environment

This is typically the most time-intensive step. You need to give the prospect something realistic to evaluate, whether that's a fully provisioned POC environment with sample data or an interactive demo customised for their use case.

The goal is proving the solution's capabilities with the least amount of effort possible. Not every prospect needs a bespoke environment built from scratch. An interactive demo that simulates their key workflows can be stood up in hours and reused for similar prospects down the line. For deals that do require a full POC workspace, your solutions engineers should focus configuration on the specific pain points identified during discovery.

5. Enable the buyer

Give the prospect what they need to evaluate properly. That might mean a kickoff call, training sessions, documentation, or simply sharing a link and allowing customers to explore at their own pace. The goal is letting potential customers test drive the product independently.

The key is removing friction while keeping the prospect on track. You don't want them dropped into an open environment where they get lost and never reach the "aha moment." Interactive walkthroughs and guided demos help here by keeping the evaluation process on rails, guiding the prospect through the flows that matter without waiting on your team's calendar.

6. Gather feedback and track metrics

Don't wait until the end. Check in regularly, surface objections early, and course-correct if the evaluation process is going off track. Customer feedback during the POC process is some of the most valuable intelligence your sales team will get.

Interactive demos give you an additional advantage here: detailed analytics. You can see who viewed the demo, how long they spent, where they clicked, and where they dropped off. That tells you which stakeholders are engaged and where they might need help before you ever pick up the phone. These key insights help sales reps understand deal progression and tailor their follow-up.

7. Evaluate and close

Review against the success metrics you agreed in step one. If you defined clear success criteria upfront, this meeting should be a formality, not a negotiation. A successful sales POC should provide tangible evidence that the solution meets the buyer's needs, making the purchasing decision straightforward.

POC Success Criteria: What to Measure (And How)

Your success metrics depend on what you're trying to prove. That changes based on the deal, not the POC format. Agree on criteria before the evaluation starts, not after. If you're defining success after the proof of concept, you're rationalising, not evaluating.

Most criteria fall into three categories:

Technical feasibility

Does it work with their tools and existing systems? This covers performance, integrations, and security or compliance requirements.

You don't always need to fully integrate to prove this. Sometimes it's enough to share your API documentation, show response time logs from your monitoring, confirm you support their SSO provider, or walk through a security compliance checklist.

Interactive demos are also useful here: you can show exactly how an end-to-end integration works without actually setting it up or connecting to the buyer's existing systems. Save the full integration work for after the deal closes unless the potential buyer genuinely needs to see it running in their stack before they'll commit.

Product fit

Does it solve the problem? Can their team actually use it?

Whether you're running a full pilot or sharing interactive demos, you're largely relying on qualitative feedback here. Do stakeholders feel this is a good solution? Do they see how it fits into their existing workflows? Can the product independently handle their core use cases?

Qualitative doesn't mean vague. "The team liked it" tells you nothing. "Three out of five stakeholders agree this workflow would reduce their daily task time" is still qualitative, but it's specific and you can act on it. Define what "pass" looks like before the evaluation starts, even if the measurement is a conversation rather than a dashboard.

Business value (typically part of a POV)

How much money will this save us? How much revenue will it generate?

This is usually a calculation, but there are underlying assumptions that need to be proven first. A sales proof of concept can help validate those assumptions: does the workflow actually save the time you're claiming? Is the adoption realistic? Those inputs feed the ROI model. Once you've got alignment on the assumptions, working through the numbers becomes straightforward.

This is POV territory, but for some deals the proof of concept naturally evolves into a POV when the buyer starts asking about ROI and the potential benefits become clear. That's a good sign.

Why POCs Fail (And How to Avoid It)

Most POC failures aren't technical. They're process failures: poor qualification, weak stakeholder alignment, or lack of ownership on either side. The best way to avoid a failed POC is to be more deliberate about which deals get one in the first place.

FAQ

What does POC mean in sales?

POC stands for proof of concept. In a sales context, it's a trial period where a prospect tests your product in a real or simulated environment before committing to purchase. The goal is to answer one question: "will this work for us?"

What is the difference between a POC and a demo?

A demo shows the product. A POC lets the prospect use it. Demos are typically seller-led and short (30-60 minutes). POCs are buyer-led, longer, and involve hands-on evaluation. Interactive demos blur this line by offering hands-on experience without the full setup burden of a traditional POC.

What is the difference between POC and POV (proof of value)?

A POC validates that the product works (technical and functional fit). A POV validates that it delivers business value (ROI, cost savings, revenue impact). Some teams use them interchangeably. Others run a POV as a stage after the POC, once feasibility is established and the conversation shifts to "what's this worth?"

How long should a sales POC last?

It depends on the format. A full pilot typically runs 2-4 weeks for SMB/mid-market and 4-8 weeks for enterprise. Interactive demos can compress this to days. Longer isn't better. Extended POCs often indicate unclear objectives or lack of urgency. Set a firm timeline and stick to it.

What are POC success criteria?

Measurable outcomes agreed before the evaluation starts. These typically fall into three categories: technical feasibility (integrations, performance, security), product fit (does the team see this solving their problem?), and business value (what's the projected ROI?).

Who is responsible for running a sales POC?

Usually a sales engineer or solutions consultant, in partnership with the AE and the prospect's project lead. Clear ownership on both sides is critical. On the buyer's side, you need a named executive sponsor who can push the evaluation toward a decision.

Can an interactive demo replace a POC?

Often, yes. Especially for visual products, smaller deals, or early-stage qualification. Interactive demos offer hands-on experience without the setup burden. For complex enterprise deals with integration requirements that can only be validated in a live environment, a full POC may still be needed. Many teams use a hybrid approach.